Off a gravel road at the edge of a college campus ā next door to the townās holding pen for stray dogs ā is a busy test site for the newest technologies in drinking water treatment.
In theĀ large shed-turned-laboratory, University of Massachusetts Amherst engineer David Reckhow has started a movement. More people want to use his lab to test new water treatment technologies than the building has space for.
TheĀ labĀ is a revitalization success story. In the 1970s, when the Clean Water Act put new restrictions on water pollution, the diminutive grey building in Amherst, Mass. was a place to test those pollution-control measures. But funding was fickle, and over the years, the building fell into disrepair. In 2015, Reckhow brought the site back to life. He and a team of researchers cleaned out the junk, whacked the weeds that engulfed the building and installed hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of monitoring equipment, much of it donated or bought secondhand.
āWe recognized that there’s a lot of need for drinking water technology,ā Reckhow says.Ā Researchers, students and start-up companies all want access to test ways to disinfect drinking water, filter out contaminants or detect water-quality slipups. On a Monday afternoon in October, the lab is busy. Students crunch data around a big table in the main room. Small-scale tests of technology that uses electrochemistry to clean water chug along, hooked up to monitors that track water quality. On a lab bench sits a graduate studentās low-cost replica of an expensive piece of monitoring equipment. The device alerts water treatment plants when the by-products of disinfection chemicals in a water supply are reaching dangerous levels. In an attached garage, two startup companies are running larger-scale tests of new kinds of membranes that filter out contaminants.
Parked behind the shed is the almost-ready-to-roll newcomer. Starting in 2019, the Mobile Water Innovation Laboratory will take promising new and affordable technologies to local communities for testing.Ā Thatās important, says Reckhow, because thereās so much variety in the quality of water that comes into drinking water treatment plants. On-site testing is the only way to know whether a new approach is effective, he says, especially for newer technologies without long-term track records.
The facilityās popularity reflects a persistent concern in the United States: how to ensure affordable access to clean, safe drinking water. Although U.S. drinking water is heavily regulated and pretty clean overall, recent high-profile contamination cases,Ā such as the 2014 lead crisis in Flint, Mich.Ā (SN: 3/19/16, p. 8), have exposed weaknesses in the system and shaken peopleās trust in their tap water.
In 2013 and 2014, 42 drinking waterāassociated outbreaks resulted in more than 1,000 illnesses and 13 deaths,Ā based on reportsĀ to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The top culprits wereĀ LegionellaĀ bacteria and some form of chemical, toxin or parasite, according to data published in November 2017.
Those numbers tell only part of the story, however. Many of the contaminants that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulates through the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act cause problems only when exposure happens over time; the effects of contaminants like lead donāt appear immediately after exposure. Records of EPA rule violations note that in 2015,Ā 21 million people were servedĀ by drinking water systems that didnāt meet standards, researchers reported in a February study in theĀ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. That report tracked trends in drinking water violations from 1982 to 2015.
New rules boost violations
The Safe Drinking Water Act regulates levels of contaminants in public water supplies. This graph tracks violations of the act over time. Spikes in violations often coincide with new, more stringent rules.
Current technology can remove most contaminants, says David Sedlak, an environmental engineer at the University of California, Berkeley. Those include microbes, arsenic, nitrates and lead. āAnd then there are some that are very difficult to degrade or transform,ā such as industrial chemicals called PFAS.
Smaller communities, especially, canāt always afford top-of-the-line equipment or infrastructure overhauls to, for example,Ā replace lead pipes. So Reckhowās facility is testing approaches to help communities address water-quality issues in affordable ways.
Some researchers are adding technologies to deal with new, potentially harmful contaminants. Others are designing approaches that work with existing water infrastructure or clean up contaminants at their source.
How is your water treated?
A typical drinking water treatment plant sends water throughĀ a series of steps.
First, coagulants are added to the water. These chemicals clump together sediments, which can cloud water or make it taste funny, so they are bigger and easier to remove. A gentle shaking or spinning of the water, called flocculation, helps those clumps formĀ (1). Next, the water flows into big tanks to sit for a while so the sediments can fall to the bottomĀ (2). The cleaner water then moves through membranes that filter out smaller contaminantsĀ (3). Disinfection, via chemicals or ultraviolet light, kills harmful bacteria and virusesĀ (4). Then the water is ready for distributionĀ (5).
Thereās a lot of room for variation within that basic water treatment process. Chemicals added at different stages can trigger reactions that break down chunky, toxic organic molecules into less harmful bits. Ion-exchange systems that separate contaminants by their electric charge can remove ions like magnesium or calcium that make water āhard,ā as well as heavy metals, such as lead and arsenic, and nitrates from fertilizer runoff. Cities mix and match these strategies, adjusting chemicals and prioritizing treatment components, based on the precise chemical qualities of the local water supply.
Some water utilities are streamlining the treatment process by installing technologies like reverse osmosis, which removes nearly everything from the water by forcing the water molecules through a selectively permeable membrane with extremely tiny holes. Reverse osmosis can replace a number of steps in the water treatment process or reduce the number of chemicals added to water. But itās expensive to install and operate, keeping it out of reach for many cities.
Fourteen percent of U.S. residents get water from wells and other private sources that arenāt regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act. These people face the same contamination challenges as municipal water systems, but without the regulatory oversight, community support or funding.
āWhen it comes to lead in private wells ā¦ youāre on your own. Nobody is going to help you,ā says Marc Edwards, the Virginia Tech engineer who helped uncover the Flint water crisis. Edwards and Virginia Tech colleague Kelsey PieperĀ collected water-quality data from over 2,000 wells across VirginiaĀ in 2012 and 2013. Some were fine, but others had lead levels of more than 100 parts per billion. When levels are higher than its 15 ppb threshold, the EPA mandates that cities take steps to control corrosion and notify the public about the contamination. The researchers reported those findings in 2015 in theĀ Journal of Water and Health.
To remove lead and other contaminants, well users often rely on point-of-use treatments. A filter on the tap removes most, but not all, contaminants. Some people spring for costly reverse osmosis systems.
Contaminants to keep out of the tap
Microbes:Ā Untreated waterĀ can hostĀ harmful bacteria and viruses.
By-products of disinfection:Ā Disinfectants such as chlorine and bromine can clear water of dangerous microbes. But these chemicals can react with other molecules to form dangerous by-products such as toxic chloroform.
Industrial chemicals:Ā Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, widely used to make nonstick coatings and firefighting foams, are a large group of industrial chemicals that areĀ hard to remove from drinking waterĀ andĀ hard to track.
Arsenic:Ā Arsenic is a concern for the 14 percent of U.S. residents who draw their drinking water from private wells instead of public water systems. Arsenic occurs naturally, butĀ can also get into groundwatervia agriculture or mining.
Nitrates:Ā NitratesĀ enter water suppliesĀ largely through runoff from farms and fertilized lawns. In excess, the chemicals can prevent red blood cells from carrying oxygen through the body.
Lead:Ā The EPAĀ mandatesĀ that cities adjust water chemistry to minimize the amount of lead that leaches from pipes into tap water, but those corrosion-controlling measures are not foolproof.